Bitcoin Price Forecast - BTC-USD Near $88K $24B Options Expiry Put $80K Support at Risk
BTC-USD hovers just below $90,000 after a Binance flash wick to $24,111, with $175M ETF outflows and a record year-end options expiry tightening the range between $80K support and $90K resistance | That's TradnigNEWS
Bitcoin (BTC-USD) Christmas snapshot: $87K–$88K in a tight, fragile range
Spot price, intraday band and market cap on Dec. 25, 2025
Bitcoin (BTC-USD) trades around $87,000–$88,500, with most feeds clustering near $88,000. The 24-hour range sits roughly between $86,400 and just under $88,000, with total market capitalization around $1.74–$1.75 trillion and spot plus broader venue volume near $21–22 billion. BTC remains about 30% below the early October all-time high close to $126,000, so price is still elevated in historical terms but clearly off the euphoric peak. The tape looks calm, but under the surface it is driven by weak ETF demand, a record options expiry, and thin Christmas liquidity that can quickly turn into sharp moves.
ETF flows and institutional positioning: five straight days of outflows into sub-$90K BTC
Spot Bitcoin ETFs in the US have shifted from strong net buyers to consistent net sellers. Recent SoSoValue data show about $175.29 million in one-day net outflows, marking five consecutive sessions of withdrawals since December 18. Across mid-December, combined BTC and ETH vehicles have shed roughly $1.1–$1.2 billion in a short window. This reverses the earlier pattern where flows into these funds helped propel BTC to the $120K+ zone. At $85K–$90K, the marginal institutional dollar is now exiting rather than accumulating, which means any upside push has to fight against ETF redemption overhang instead of being powered by fresh inflows.
Derivatives overhang: $23–$28.5B options expiry and a crowded call structure
The immediate catalyst is derivatives, not macro data. Around $23.47 billion in BTC options expires on December 26, and aggregate year-end open interest on a major venue is near $28.5 billion, of which roughly $21.7 billion sits in call options. Only about 6% of that open interest holds strikes at $92,000 or below; the bulk of call positions is stacked between $100,000 and $125,000, far above current spot in the high-$80Ks. Put open interest is heavily concentrated between $75,000 and $86,000, with about $7.7 billion of exposure in that downside pocket. The max-pain level sits around $95,000, which is the level where most options would expire worthless and option sellers lose the least. The put/call ratio near 0.35 confirms that traders came into year-end heavily skewed to bullish calls that are now deeply out of the money. As long as BTC remains below $94,000, option writers hold the advantage and would prefer a pin somewhere between $87K and $92K, where both upside calls and a large chunk of downside puts are damaged simultaneously.
Volatility flashpoint: Binance’s $24,111 wick and what it says about BTC liquidity
A single episode illustrates current fragility. On Binance, the BTC/USD1 pair briefly printed down to roughly $24,111 before snapping back above $87,000 within seconds. Major BTC/USDT and mainstream BTC/USD pairs did not follow this move, confirming this was not a market-wide crash but a pair-specific liquidity air pocket. The USD1 instrument is tied to a stablecoin associated with World Liberty Financial, which makes that venue–pair combination inherently thinner than the core BTC/USDT books. The event fits a classic flash-wick profile: holiday-reduced liquidity, thinner order books, wider spreads and a single aggressive order or malfunctioning algorithm sweeping through the book until resting bids finally catch it. The practical conclusion is that the apparent stability at $87K–$88K masks microstructural risk; in stressed or illiquid pairs, BTC can still print absurd levels without any new macro information, especially during holidays.
Support map from CME futures and URPD: why the $70K–$80K band is structurally weak
Five years of CME Bitcoin futures data show how many trading days BTC has spent in each price band, which is a direct proxy for how much structural positioning and support has been built. The $30,000–$39,999 and $40,000–$49,999 ranges each hosted nearly 200 trading days, indicating heavy historical consolidation. By contrast, BTC has spent only 28 trading days in the $70,000–$79,999 band and 49 days in the $80,000–$89,999 band, excluding the very brief stays at all-time highs above $120,000. Glassnode’s UTXO Realized Price Distribution aligns with that picture and shows limited aggregate coin supply last moving between $70,000 and $80,000, while much more was accumulated at lower levels and near the prior euphoria. That makes the $70K–$80K area structurally under-developed as support. If BTC trades down into that corridor, it will be probing territory that has not yet absorbed heavy two-way flow, whereas the $50K–$70K region remains the true backbone of this cycle’s structural positioning.
Wyckoff accumulation view: controlled spring risk toward $80K, not a cycle top
Short-term structure on the four-hour and daily charts lines up well with an unfinished Wyckoff accumulation schematic. The pattern already shows a selling climax, an automatic rally and multiple secondary tests, but lacks a decisive spring. A spring requires a deliberate sweep below visible support to flush residual supply and rebuild a stronger ownership base. Current analysis identifies $85,000 as a key support band that has already triggered reactive bounces, and $80,000 as the likely spring zone where liquidity and prior demand coincide. With BTC trading around $87,500–$88,000, price sits between overhead resistance near $90,000–$94,000 and this vulnerable band. A move into the $80,000 range would not automatically mark a trend breakdown; under this framework it would complete the accumulation cycle, wash out late longs, concentrate coins in stronger hands and often be followed by a rapid reclaim of the previous range as the first sign of strength.
Short-term technical picture: RSI, MACD and the key price levels to watch
Momentum indicators support the idea of a tired market near the top of its short-term range. The Relative Strength Index on the daily chart is around 43, below the neutral 50 mark, which indicates that bearish pressure is slowly taking control after the rejection at $90,000. The MACD line has recently crossed bullishly, but the positive histogram bars are shrinking, so upside momentum is already stalling rather than accelerating. On the price map, immediate resistance remains the $90,000 psychological level, which rejected BTC earlier this week, followed by the next resistance near $94,253 that would become relevant on a clean breakout. On the downside, $87,000 is the first local shelf where BTC stabilized recently, $85,569 is the critical support cited by multiple technical reads and a loss of that level reopens the path toward the $80,000 spring zone. In this configuration, 5–7% intraday or one-day swings are entirely normal, meaning a move from $87K to $82K can occur without any new macro catalyst, driven purely by options hedging and thin books.
Cross-asset context: record equities, record gold and a muted Bitcoin response
The cross-asset picture explains why Bitcoin is not the primary recipient of year-end risk demand. The S&P 500 has pushed to fresh records around 6,932, with year-to-date gains of roughly 17% and broad leadership from mega-cap technology and AI-adjacent names. At the same time, gold futures have printed new highs near $4,555 per ounce, with spot gold holding around $4,480–$4,500, and silver trading near $72 after a strong run. Equities are delivering a classic late-cycle risk rally and precious metals are delivering the hard-asset hedge. Bitcoin, despite its “digital gold” narrative, is lagging both. It is underperforming the broad equity complex from its recent high and underperforming gold and silver in the last leg of the move. Sentiment gauges in crypto remain tilted toward fear and caution, even as macro data and traditional risk assets show optimism. Institutional allocators can get growth exposure through indexes and protection through metals without taking on headline and regulatory risk in crypto, which explains why ETF flows are negative at current BTC prices.
Macro and policy backdrop: Fed easing, soft landing and BTC’s relative appeal
The Federal Reserve has already shifted away from peak tightening. The federal funds rate in the 3.50–3.75% band reflects a meaningful retreat from prior highs, and market pricing into 2026 expects roughly 50 basis points more in cuts rather than a dramatic easing cycle. Consensus projections put S&P 500 earnings growth around 13% for 2025 and 15% for 2026, with index targets in the 7,500–7,700 region from major houses. For Bitcoin, this macro combination is neutral to supportive. Lower real yields and a soft-landing scenario are generally positive for long-duration risk and speculative assets. Regulatory risk has moderated compared with the pre-ETF phase; spot products are live, and the discussion is now about incremental oversight rather than existential bans. The issue for BTC is not that macro is hostile; it is that macro is favoring assets that do not carry crypto-specific risk. Until Bitcoin can either reclaim leadership as a high-beta beneficiary of easing or reassert itself as the superior hard-asset hedge compared with gold, it will remain an optional allocation rather than a core one for most institutional books.
Read More
-
COPX ETF Price At $73.75: Copper Miners Surge On Record Copper And AI Demand
25.12.2025 · TradingNEWS ArchiveStocks
-
XRP ETF Assets Break $1.25B as XRP-USD Holds $1.87 in a Tight $1.85–$1.91 Range
25.12.2025 · TradingNEWS ArchiveCrypto
-
Natural Gas Price Forecast: NG=F Near $4.25 After $4.59 Spike as LNG Flows and Winter Cold Collide
25.12.2025 · TradingNEWS ArchiveCommodities
-
USD/JPY Price Forecast - USDJPY=X At 156: Can The 160 Line Hold Before A Drop Toward 140?
25.12.2025 · TradingNEWS ArchiveForex
Integrated risk map between $80K and $100K for BTC-USD
Combining spot, flows, derivatives, structure and macro creates a clear risk corridor. Spot sits around $87K–$88K, about 30% below the $126K peak. ETF flows show $175–$188 million per day in net outflows and roughly $1.1–$1.2 billion in aggregate redemptions over a short window, so demand from listed products is negative, not neutral. Derivatives add $23–$28.5 billion of expiring options, with most of $21.7 billion in calls concentrated between $100K and $125K, a max-pain level near $95K and put clusters between $75K and $86K. Structural analysis from CME trading days and URPD indicates that $70K–$80K is a relatively thin band of historical support, while $50K–$70K remains robust. Technicals put resistance at $90K and $94,253, and support at $87K, $85,569 and $80K. The Wyckoff view points toward a likely spring into the low-$80Ks, possibly toward $80K, followed by an attempt to reclaim $90K–$95K once the December 26 options event and holiday liquidity distortion have passed. If BTC fails to hold $80,000 with real volume and cannot reclaim it quickly, the risk opens for a deeper regression into the richer $60K–$70K support region, which is where long-term investors should expect heavy dip-buying interest to reappear.
Verdict on Bitcoin (BTC-USD): high-risk HOLD with a medium-term bullish bias
At current levels around $87K–$88K, the most accurate classification for BTC-USD is a high-risk HOLD with a medium-term bullish bias. It is not a clear SELL because ETF outflows and options headwinds are cyclical rather than terminal, structural support between $50K and $70K remains intact, and the Wyckoff schematic plus prior consolidation still favor higher prices over a 12–24 month horizon if BTC can survive a spring and reclaim $90K–$95K. It is not a low-risk BUY because the combination of persistent ETF redemptions, a $23–$28.5 billion options expiry, weak support in the $70K–$80K area and thinning holiday liquidity create an elevated probability of a fast 5–10% drawdown into the low-$80Ks before any sustained attempt toward $100,000. Short-term traders should treat $85K–$90K as a noisy options-driven range. Existing medium-term holders can justify staying invested while being prepared psychologically and tactically for a test of $80,000. Large new allocations make more sense either on a clean reclaim of $94K–$95K with stabilizing ETF flows, or on a washout into the $80K or high-$70K zone where structural support can be rebuilt at a discount relative to the current price.