Oil Price Forecast - Oil Near 7-Month Highs as WTI Eyes $70 and Brent Reclaims $72 on Iran Risk

Oil Price Set-Up: WTI / CL=F and Brent / BZ=F at Seven-Month Highs

WTI / CL=F is trading in the mid-$60s, around $66–$67 a barrel after touching roughly $66.48, holding just under the key $68 cap. Brent / BZ=F is sitting in the $71–$72.50 zone, with prints near $71.56–$72.50 and a recent spike to about $72.44 – roughly a 19% gain year-to-date and the highest level in about seven months. Pricing is not random; it reflects a visible geopolitical risk premium rather than a fundamental supply shock. The strip is effectively marking a mid-point between a comfortable $50s regime and a $90–$100 stress scenario.

Middle East Risk Premium: U.S.–Iran Standoff as the Core Catalyst for Oil

The dominant driver for Oil, WTI / CL=F and Brent / BZ=F is the U.S.–Iran confrontation. Markets are assigning probability to U.S. strikes on Iran while a “last-chance” nuclear round in Geneva approaches. WTI at $66–$67 and Brent above $71 are the market’s hedge against disruption through the Gulf and broader Middle East export routes. The U.S. has reinforced the region with carrier groups: USS Gerald R. Ford has arrived at Souda Bay, Crete, while USS Abraham Lincoln is positioned near Oman with more than 5,600 personnel and strike capability. The partial evacuation of the U.S. embassy in Beirut adds another hard signal that Washington is preparing for escalation risk. Iran’s messaging that a diplomatic channel is still open is the only reason you are not seeing CL=F already challenging the $70–$75 band. At the same time, high-profile analysts are openly discussing $90–$100 oil if talks fail and conflict risk shifts from peripheral to direct. Current pricing is the compromise: elevated, not yet in panic mode.

Trade War and Macro Drag: Why Oil Is Elevated but Not Exploding

The geopolitical premium is running into a macro cap driven by trade and growth worries. Donald Trump’s push for blanket 15% tariffs and his narrative that the rest of the world must “pay” for past trade imbalances are feeding recession and trade-volume risk. Those tariffs, plus uncertainty around global supply chains, compress forward demand expectations for Oil. Slower trade means fewer barrels consumed for shipping, trucking, and industrial production. That is why WTI / CL=F is stuck in a $62–$70 structural band and Brent / BZ=F near $71–$74 instead of already pricing an outright supply shock. On top of that, Russia’s exports have remained resilient despite sanctions, with “dark fleet” flows still pushing seaborne volumes higher than early-2022 levels. Ukraine’s strikes on infrastructure such as Druzhba introduce event risk, but so far, the market sees disruptions as partial and temporary, not a multi-million-barrel loss. Banks are already flagging long-term oversupply risk – some projections even sketch scenarios where oil could slide into the $30s by 2027 if U.S. shale, non-OPEC growth and slower demand collide. Short term, that long-dated bearish view is irrelevant for CL=F and BZ=F, but it limits how far the front of the curve can rerate on war premium alone.

Technical Structure in WTI / CL=F: Bullish Bias, but $70 Is the Trigger

Technically, WTI / CL=F rebuilt a clear bullish structure from the mid-$50s. On the monthly chart, price has rebounded off the midline of a descending channel, posting a strong reversal candle in January 2026 and extending above that high in February. Immediate resistance is clustered around $68–$70. That band aligns with: a) the upper edge of the recent $62–$66 consolidation, b) a descending trend line off the April 2024 swing high, and c) key psychological round-number resistance at $70. A clean daily and weekly close above $70 unlocks the next leg higher toward $77–$80, which would be the first true breakout of the post-2024 corrective phase. On the downside, $62 is the key line. A break back below $62 would signal that the inverted head-and-shoulders structure that formed above $55 has failed, opening a path back toward the $55 demand zone. As long as CL=F holds above $62 and continues to print higher lows on daily closes, the technical bias is moderately bullish with a defined trigger at $70.

Short-Term WTI Price Action: Inverted Head-and-Shoulders and Ascending Channel

On lower time frames, WTI / CL=F shows constructive price action. The market carved out an inverted head-and-shoulders above $55, with the neckline around $62. The breakout through $62 has been respected; price is now operating in an ascending channel, consolidating around the midline. Within this channel, the $66–$68 zone is an active battle area. Sustained trading above $68 pushes the upper channel boundary near $70 into play. If CL=F can push through $70 with strong volume, momentum traders will likely rotate in, reinforcing the move towards $77–$80. Conversely, a failure to hold the channel midline and a daily close back below $62 signal exhaustion of the current leg, putting $55 back on the table as the next high-probability target.

Brent / BZ=F: Testing $72–$74 Resistance with $80–$90 Targets Above

Brent / BZ=F has its own clearly defined grid. On the weekly chart, price is pressing a descending trend line that has capped rallies since mid-2024. Last week’s strong close above $71 and intraday tests of $72.50 signal that bulls are willing to challenge that resistance. The critical band is $72–$74. That zone aligns with: a) horizontal resistance from multiple failed rallies over the past six months, and b) the upper edge of a descending broadening wedge visible on daily charts. A confirmed breakout above $74 opens immediate upside toward $80–$83, and a sustained move beyond $81–$83 would complete the wedge breakout pattern, validating a medium-term bull leg targeting the $88–$90 region. RSI on weekly charts is trending higher above the midline, indicating momentum is already shifting in favour of BZ=F bulls. Failure at $72–$74, especially if accompanied by de-escalation headlines from U.S.–Iran talks, would likely drag Brent back into the high-$60s, re-testing support near $68–$69.

Risk Premium Scenarios: Path to $90–$100 vs Pullback Risks

Scenario analysis for Oil, WTI / CL=F and Brent / BZ=F is straightforward right now. On the upside, sustained failure of U.S.–Iran talks, further embassy drawdowns, or a direct strike on Iranian infrastructure are the kind of catalysts that could push CL=F from $66–$67 towards $80 and BZ=F from $71–$72.5 toward $90. Energy consultants are already saying $90–$100 oil is “within reach” if war becomes more likely than diplomacy. That path would almost certainly involve a full break of $70 in WTI and $74 in Brent, with option markets repricing skew and implied volatility in tandem. The downside scenario is driven by diplomacy and macro: any genuine progress in talks, or a clear signal that Washington is stepping away from kinetic options, would shave off several dollars of risk premium. Add in renewed fear around Trump-style tariffs and global growth, and you have a setup where CL=F can slip back towards $62 and BZ=F towards the high-$60s, even without new barrels coming online. Both paths are binary: the market is balancing between geopolitics that can push prices $10–$20 higher and macro headwinds that cap demand and drag prices lower once the war narrative cools.

Equity Read-Through: BP and Energy Stocks as Leverage on Oil’s Risk Premium

The current structure in Oil is already visible in equity names. European oil and gas stocks have printed record levels, with Brent up about 19% in 2026 year-to-date. BP traded up around 0.4–1.4% into the latest move, with the share price near 476p and less than 3% below its 52-week high. BP’s stock behaviour shows how large integrated producers are acting as leveraged proxies on Brent: when BZ=F pushes into the $72–$74 band, equities respond almost mechanically. However, there are idiosyncratic caps: BP paused a $750 million buyback and booked roughly $4 billion in impairments on renewables and biogas assets, which tempers enthusiasm. For a stock like BP, the current $70–$72 BZ=F zone supports elevated earnings power, but the market will still dissect capital allocation, debt, and buyback guidance at the April 28 results before assigning a higher multiple.

Positioning, Sentiment and the Macro Ceiling on Oil

Even with the risk premium, the market is not behaving like peak-cycle euphoria. Trade-war risk and growth concerns are pulling capital into defensive assets such as gold and away from the most leveraged cyclical plays. Crude futures have seen steady length added on the way up, but allocations are still constrained by fears of a macro slowdown triggered by tariffs and higher long-term yields. The tariff overhang is important for Oil: if global trade volumes slow while supply stays broadly adequate, every geopolitical spike becomes a fade once headlines calm down. This is exactly why the market is forcing WTI / CL=F to “prove” itself above $70 and Brent / BZ=F above $74 rather than blindly chasing higher levels on rhetoric alone.

Directional View: Oil Bias, Bullish or Bearish, and Tactical Stance

Given the current configuration, the bias for Oil, WTI / CL=F and Brent / BZ=F is tactically bullish with a defined trigger and a clear risk floor. Spot is holding elevated levels, geopolitical risk is real and priced, and technicals are aligned for upside if resistance breaks. At the same time, the macro lid from tariffs and growth concerns is intact. From a pure price-action standpoint, WTI / CL=F holding above $62 and pressing $68–$70, and Brent / BZ=F holding above $69 and challenging $72–$74, supports a Buy-on-dips bias rather than an aggressive chase. If WTI fails back below $62 or Brent loses $69 with no new geopolitical escalation, the structure flips back toward a broader range and the outlook turns neutral to mildly bearish. As long as conflict risk stays live and CL=F and BZ=F respect their key supports, the market is skewed to the upside, with $77–$80 for WTI and $88–$90 for Brent as realistic upside bands in a risk-on scenario.

That's TradingNEWS