Bitcoin ETFs Bleed $133M as IBIT ETF Slides and $50K Risk Zone Comes Into View

Bitcoin spot ETFs and IBIT: from runaway success to controlled bleed

Bitcoin spot ETFs in the US have moved from aggressive accumulation to a clear outflow regime. Net inflows since launch are still huge, but direction has reversed. Cumulative net inflows peaked around $63B in October and now sit near $54B, after about $8.66B has left over the last few months. Total ETF assets remain around $83–98B, but the marginal flow has turned negative on most days, and that is what sets the tone for price in the short term. Within that complex, IBIT is the dominant instrument. IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust, NASDAQ:IBIT) trades around $37.93, inside a 52-week band of $35.30–$71.82, with a market value near $165.8B. It controls roughly $57B of the total spot BTC ETF AUM, more than half the wrapper system. On the latest heavy day it saw more than $84M in single-session redemptions, leading ETF outflows as Bitcoin slid below $66,000 before stabilizing near $67,000

From net intake machine to daily outflow regime

Spot ETF flow data from SoSoValue, Farside and the exchange reports all draw the same picture. On Feb 18, US spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded about $133.3M in net outflows. That pushed weekly withdrawals to roughly $238M, stretching a multi-week bleeding phase. Year-to-date, spot Bitcoin ETFs have lost around $2.5B. Outflow days dominate: since the October 2025 peak, there have been 55 outflow days out of 89, and the Feb 12 session alone saw about 6,120 BTC leave, worth roughly $416M at the time. That was the largest single-day outflow of the current cycle

Fear, BTC price structure, and why the tape feels heavy near $67,000

While ETFs leak capital, BTC-USD trades near $67,000, down roughly 24% year-to-date and more than 40% from the October all-time high around $126,000. The Crypto Fear & Greed Index is pinned in Extreme Fear, reflecting broad risk aversion. ETF trading volume sits under $3B a day, signalling thin participation. Price action is trapped between support in the $65,000–$67,000 zone and resistance around $70,000–$72,000. Volatility is compressed, but every test lower meets a tape already skewed by ETF redemptions, weak spot demand and cautious derivatives positioning. That is why each bounce feels like a short-covering move, not a trend change

ETF outflows, exchange inflows and the dual supply shock

Flows on centralized venues reinforce the ETF picture. Exchange data over the last week show positive net BTC inflows, typically +391 to +841 BTC per day, with a recent reading near +553 BTC. That means more coins are moving onto trading platforms, not off them. Combine that with the 11,042 BTC of net ETF redemptions in the last seven days, and you get two structural supply channels—ETFs providing coins back to the market and spot holders sending coins to exchanges. In a low-liquidity environment, that dual supply pressure is enough to cap rallies and keep BTC pinned near the lower edge of its recent range

Solana ETFs and rotation inside the crypto wrapper complex

While Bitcoin and Ethereum products bleed, Solana (SOL-USD) ETFs show the opposite behaviour. Solana spot ETFs have logged a six-day inflow streak, adding around $2.40M on Feb 18 alone and roughly $113M year-to-date. Since their October 2025 launch, these funds have accumulated close to $700M in assets. At the same time, SOL’s own price trades near $81–$82, down about 38% over the last 30 days and 50% over the past year, moving in a $76.81–$90.59 band with key levels at $75 and $90–$100. That combination—price weakness, negative funding at times, but steady ETF inflows—shows active rotation: some capital is leaving BTC and ETH wrappers and probing relative value in Solana-linked products, even as the broader market stays risk-off

Solana on-chain and derivatives: accumulation versus short pressure

SOL’s on-chain data show a network still expanding: wallet creation and participation have risen steadily, even as price drifted lower. Metrics like network growth and social dominance from Santiment show adoption holding up while hype fades. At the same time, derivatives metrics from CoinGlass and SoSoValue highlight an aggressive build-up in short exposure. Funding rates have dipped into negative territory, indicating shorts paying longs, while open interest increased to about $5.24B as price slipped toward $81. This mix—growing on-chain activity, negative funding, and heavy shorting—creates conditions for a potential short squeeze, but only if spot demand returns and price can reclaim the $90–$100 band. As long as SOL trades below $82–$90, the setup remains an indecisive stand-off between structural interest and tactical pessimism

Macro backdrop: restrictive policy and risk sorting against BTC

Outside crypto, macro conditions still favour caution. US equity funds recently posted weekly outflows of about $1.42B, while bond funds absorbed fresh capital as rate-cut expectations were pushed out after stronger-than-expected jobs data. Corporate spending tied to AI and capex has raised concerns about earnings durability and leverage. In this environment, portfolios tilt toward defensive assets and liquid yield. Bitcoin sits on the wrong side of that trade: a high-beta, liquidity-sensitive asset with no cash-flow floor, competing against short-dated Treasuries and money-market instruments yielding attractive, regulated returns. That is exactly the kind of backdrop where spot ETF outflows and cautious exchange flows are amplified rather than absorbed

ProShares IQMM and the institutional pull of compliant cash surrogates

The launch of ProShares IQMM money market ETF under the GENIUS Act framework adds a new kind of competitor for capital. IQMM is built specifically for US-regulated stablecoin issuers and large treasuries that must hold reserves in high-quality liquid assets. It invests solely in short-term US Treasuries, agency debt and Fed-eligible instruments, maintains an average maturity under 60 days, uses daily portfolio disclosure, and charges about 15 bps in fees. With US dollar stablecoins around $180B in circulating supply and a 100% reserve requirement, the addressable market for this ETF structure can easily exceed $150B over a few years. For regulated balance sheets, that is a clean, yield-bearing alternative to leaving idle cash near crypto rails. Every dollar that prefers a GENIUS-compliant wrapper like IQMM over a BTC ETF or spot BTC position is another headwind for Bitcoin’s share of institutional balance sheets

How far the Bitcoin ETF bleed can go at current run-rate

Take the recent ETF outflow pace as a simple stress test. Roughly $8.66B has left since Oct 10, over 89 trading days, which is about $90M per trading day in net redemptions. Start from around $98B in total Bitcoin ETF AUM. If that pace stayed constant, the wrapper complex would drain over roughly 1,011 trading days, about four years of weekdays, pushing an effective empty shell into early 2030. That extreme scenario will almost certainly be interrupted by rallies and renewed inflows, but it defines the direction if nothing improves. A more realistic horizon is the next halving, estimated near April 11, 2028, about 558 trading days away. At $90M of net outflows per day from a $98B base, ETF AUM would fall toward $44B by that date. At mid-$60K BTC, that still implies roughly ~660k BTC inside wrappers, but the myth of one-way ETF absorption would be gone. The narrative would flip from “ETFs are the structural buyer” to “ETFs are just another venue where positioning cycles in and out”

Institutional positioning: CME, Coinbase versus Binance, and sovereign allocations

Institutional risk appetite shows the same split. On the one hand, CME Bitcoin futures open interest has dropped by about two-thirds from late-2024 peaks to roughly $8B, confirming that leverage and directional risk on regulated futures have been cut decisively. Coinbase has been trading at a discount to Binance, which is a clean sign that US-based flows are net sellers relative to offshore. That lines up perfectly with US ETF redemptions and net exchange inflows. On the other hand, long-horizon allocators are quietly adding. Two major Abu Dhabi funds now hold more than $1B in BTC via ETFs, and Mubadala Investment Company alone owns over 12.7M IBIT shares, a position valued at >$630M, up about 46% quarter-on-quarter. That shows that while fast money is reducing risk, strategic capital with multi-year horizons is building exposure into weakness, using the same IBIT wrapper that shorter-term holders are exiting

BTC technicals, ETF flows and the $50K stress line

On the chart, Bitcoin trades in a clean down-shift from its October peak. The move from roughly $126K back to the $67K area represents more than a 40% retracement. Intraday dips below $66K have been bought, but rallies stall near $70K–$72K. Support sits in the $65K–$67K band; below that, the next serious demand zone sits around $50K, flagged by Standard Chartered as a logical retest before any larger rebound. That bank still sees a path to $100K later in 2026, but explicitly acknowledges that near-term pressure remains high. Short-term Sharpe readings have dropped into historically attractive zones, where previous cycles saw “violent recoveries to new highs” after the flush. That does not provide timing, but it does confirm that the risk-reward profile is shifting as fear and drawdown deepen

IBIT as the liquid, leveraged proxy on the ETF narrative

Because IBIT tracks spot BTC and concentrates the majority of ETF assets, it functions as a liquid proxy on the entire Bitcoin-ETF narrative. At $37.93, with a range of $35.30–$71.82 over the past year, IBIT reflects the same >40% drawdown from the October top, but wrapped in NASDAQ liquidity and BlackRock’s brand. At current levels, IBIT’s price effectively embeds three assumptions: that ETF outflows remain serious but do not grind AUM to zero; that Bitcoin keeps its role as a core digital asset on institutional dashboards; and that Wall Street treats Bitcoin exposure as cyclical risk, not a one-way structural allocation. If ETF flows stabilise or flip back to net positive—even modestly—IBIT does not need a new story. It simply tracks spot BTC higher while benefiting from its status as the default wrapper for large pools of capital

Conditions needed to flip the tape from defence back to accumulation

For Bitcoin and IBIT to shift from a defensive regime to an accumulation regime, several signals have to change together. ETF flow data must at least stabilise into flat or mildly positive 5-day net flows instead of repeated $100M-plus daily outflows. CME open interest needs to stop shrinking and start building again in a healthy, non-crowded way, signalling that larger players are willing to carry risk on regulated futures. The persistent Coinbase discount versus Binance has to narrow, showing that US demand is no longer the marginal seller. And macro conditions need to move away from “restrictive and uncertain” toward a clearer rate-cut path that brings risk capital back into high-beta assets. As those conditions align, the same ETFs that are now pressure valves turn back into intake pipes

Scenario map for BTC and IBIT: downside cushion and upside torque

With BTC near $67K and IBIT at $37–$38, the plausible short-term range is wide. A continuation of current ETF outflows, ongoing positive exchange inflows, and sustained macro uncertainty would make a test of the $55K–$50K zone entirely realistic. Under that path, IBIT would track lower into the $28–$30 area, roughly in line with previous volatility patterns. On the upside, a normalization of ETF flows, a flattening in exchange net inflows, and improving macro sentiment could push BTC back through $70K–$72K, then toward the $90K–$100K supply zone where previous buyers are trapped. In that scenario, IBIT has torque back toward the $55–$60 band and potentially higher if the cycle extends

Final stance on BTC and IBIT: Buy, Sell or Hold from here

With fear elevated, flows negative, and price already 40% below the peak, the market is not pricing euphoria, it is pricing discomfort and risk reduction. ETF outflows of $8.66B, daily redemptions around $90M, and exchange inflows confirm that the current phase is a controlled exit, not a structural collapse. At the same time, cumulative net ETF inflows near $54B, total AUM around $80–100B, and sovereign allocations above $1B show that the institutional footprint remains deep. On a short-term horizon of weeks, the stance is defensive; there is no need to chase upside while flows are still bleeding and the $50K test is on the table. On a 12–36 month horizon, the combination of extreme fear, compressed Sharpe ratios, and large residual ETF AUM argues for gradual accumulation into weakness rather than capitulation. The clear decision here is Buy on weakness with staged entries, using the low-$50Ks on BTC as the stress line where the thesis would need to be revisited if ETF outflows accelerate instead of cooling. IBIT tracks that same stance: accumulate into fear, size positions assuming another 30–40% downside is possible, and let the next halving and flow regime decide how far the upside extends toward the $90K–$100K BTC band and the corresponding IBIT range

That's TradingNEWS