IBIT ETF at $38 as Bitcoin ETF Outflows and $1.9B Liquidations Put $60K BTC Support on the Line

Bitcoin ETF Flows – IBIT at $38 Sits on the Fault Line Between Forced Selling and Institutional Rotation

IBIT’s $38 handle, range and embedded Bitcoin (BTC-USD) risk

iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) trades around $38.35–$38.97, down about 1.6% on the day from a previous close of $38.97, inside a session band of $37.74–$38.69 and a 52-week range of $35.30–$71.82. At that price, IBIT is sitting less than 10% above its 1-year low and roughly 45% below its 1-year high, tracking Bitcoin (BTC-USD) stuck in the mid-$60K zone after failing to hold above $70K. The fund’s reported market value of about $166.4B effectively mirrors the underlying BTC it custodies, making it the primary listed conduit for large pools of capital that are not prepared to hold spot coins directly. Day-to-day, the $1 intraday move in IBIT implies roughly a 2.5–3% swing in embedded BTC exposure, which is why the ETF has become the cleanest listed proxy for directional leverage into the asset.

Sponsor strength and why BlackRock’s fundamentals do not change IBIT’s beta profile

The underlying sponsor’s financials support the idea that structural and operational risk is low even while market risk is high. The latest snapshot shows revenue of $7.01B, up 23.45% year on year, operating expenses of $1.05B up 48.10%, and net income of $1.13B, down 32.51%, leaving a net margin of about 16.1%, compressed by almost 45% versus the prior year. Earnings per share sit at 13.16, up 10.31%, with an effective tax rate around 23.15% and EBITDA near $2.81B, up 22.8%. On the balance sheet, cash and short-term investments of $12.6B are down 13.68%, while total equity is reported around $61.86B. Those figures tell you that the sponsor has the scale and liquidity to support a large spot BTC franchise, but they do not hedge the IBIT holder against BTC price risk. IBIT remains pure BTC-beta in a regulated wrapper, and all the volatility, drawdown risk and upside are coming from the coin, not the asset manager.

Four straight weeks of net outflows from Bitcoin ETFs and what the $360M bleed really says

Across the U.S. spot Bitcoin ETF universe, flows have turned negative for four consecutive weeks, with the latest week showing roughly $360M in net outflows from BTC products and about $161M leaving Ethereum (ETH) vehicles. That is a regime change from the early launch phase when inflows were almost one-way. Outflows of this scale signal reduced institutional risk appetite, not a structural rejection of the product. Underlying conditions are clear: the CryptoQuant Fear and Greed index has dropped to 10, a classic “extreme fear” print, daily turnover has thinned, and rallies fail to sustain beyond $70K in BTC. For IBIT, this means secondary-market liquidity remains strong, but incremental marginal demand from big accounts is no longer a one-directional tailwind. Until the flow picture stabilizes and reverses, the ETF trades in a tape where rallies are sold faster and dips take longer to refill.

BlackRock’s 1,701 BTC and 22,661 ETH move to Coinbase – liquidity management or deeper de-risking?

On-chain and wallet-tracking data show BlackRock-linked ETF addresses recently sent 1,701 BTC and 22,661 ETH to Coinbase Prime, a transfer block worth roughly $160M at current prices. That movement coincided with the week of $360M BTC ETF outflows and $161M ETH ETF outflows. Operationally, this is standard: when investors redeem ETF shares, the issuer either delivers coins out or sells spot BTC and ETH to raise cash. The transfer to Coinbase strongly suggests coins were being prepared for sale into the market, not warehoused for a liquidity buffer, especially in a week dominated by redemptions. For IBIT, the signal is simple: during stress, the fund amplifies realized selling pressure because the mechanics of meeting outflows push additional spot volume into already fragile order books. The good news is that once this wave of redemption-driven selling is done, there is less weak, leveraged capital left to be flushed. The bad news is that if macro risk persists, the next leg lower comes from fresh discretionary selling, not just mechanical flows.

Derivatives flush: $1.9B in liquidations reset leverage but put a ceiling on snap-back rallies

Derivatives venues have just pushed through about $1.9B in forced liquidations over seven days as long-heavy positioning collided with technical breaks and thin liquidity. Leverage trackers like Coinglass show that a big chunk of that size came from over-extended longs that were betting on a clean continuation above $70K. After the wipeout, desk behavior has flipped: futures desks are now defensive, skewing towards downside hedges and short bias, rather than reflexively rebuilding long carry. That has several direct consequences for BTC-USD and for IBIT:

Funding rates have moved back toward neutral after a long period of positive, long-favored carry, indicating a reset in speculative leverage but not yet a full capitulation phase.
Open interest has contracted meaningfully; if it rebuilds too quickly, the market is exposed to another cascade. If it stays low, large directional moves are more likely to be spot-flow driven and therefore more sustainable.
Liquidation heatmaps now show dense downside clusters below spot – if BTC trades into those zones, another wave of forced selling is triggered, which is why $60K has become the “line in the sand” on almost every risk desk’s map.

For IBIT holders, this backdrop means the ETF is now trading in an environment where the worst leverage has been cleaned out, but dealer positioning still caps the speed of any recovery. Any attempt by BTC to push back above $70K–$72K will run into short-cover but also into fresh hedging from desks that just absorbed a $1.9B hit.

Institutional rotation: Harvard trims IBIT and adds ETHA as ETH ETFs move into mainstream portfolios

Portfolio disclosures from Harvard Management Company show a cut of roughly 21% to its IBIT position in Q4 2025, alongside an ~$86.8M initiation in iShares Ethereum Trust (ETHA). That is not a wholesale abandonment of Bitcoin (BTC-USD); it is a rebalancing of crypto beta in a way that large endowments are likely to copy:

Crypto risk is increasingly framed as a sleeve inside broader alternatives, with 3% of portfolio value cited by Kevin O’Leary as the ceiling most institutions are willing to tolerate until quantum-computing risk and regulatory frameworks are better defined.
Within that 3%, many CIOs are now splitting exposure between BTC and ETH, using IBIT on the Bitcoin side and new spot ETH ETFs on the Ethereum side.
The ETH rotation is partly tactical: ETH has underperformed BTC, sits below $2,000, and has potentially additional return from staking once regulators allow that design to be embedded in ETFs.

For IBIT, the message is not that the product is broken. It is that Bitcoin now competes directly with Ethereum inside the same institutional risk bucket, and flow that might previously have gone 100% into BTC is now shared with ETH, even from historically conservative allocators like Harvard.

Competing flows: XRP products attract inflows while XRP-USD stalls around $1.45

Flow data around XRP-linked investment products show that they recently recorded net inflows that outpaced both Bitcoin and Ethereum, even as XRP-USD slipped about 2.5% and now trades near the $1.45 support level, below the $1.50 line. That combination – price down, products seeing inflows – tells you two things relevant for the Bitcoin ETF story:

Capital is not only rotating within BTC-ETH, it is also probing higher-beta alt exposure through regulated notes and ETPs tied to XRP, especially as some investors try to front-run an eventual U.S. spot ETF or equivalent structure.
The fact that XRP still trades under $1.50 despite those inflows underscores how fragile liquidity is outside BTC and ETH. Institutions afraid of the October 10, 2025 crash repeat are taking O’Leary’s path: concentrate serious size in BTC and ETH, with much smaller tickets in XRP and others.

IBIT thus sits in the part of the market that is still treated as the core allocation, but it is no longer the only way large money expresses crypto risk. The marginal dollar is being split across BTC, ETH and a thin layer of alt ETPs, and that dilutes the net inflow impulse into IBIT.

Macro overlay: tech-style beta, Iran risk, and why $60K has become the key spot line for BTC-USD and IBIT

Recent sessions show Bitcoin trading like a high-beta tech proxy, moving in the same direction as Nasdaq futures on macro days and selling off when equity risk is under pressure. The latest leg lower in BTC came alongside:

Weaker equity index futures and risk-off sentiment across tech.
Rising geopolitical tension between the U.S. and Iran, including language from President Trump promising “consequences” ahead of nuclear talks.
Persistent concern about higher-for-longer rates, choking risk appetite in anything viewed as a long-duration asset.

With BTC oscillating around $67,000–$68,000 and the CryptoQuant Fear and Greed index at 10, market commentary is converging on $60,000 as the critical support zone that must hold to prevent a deeper, reflexive unwind. If BTC grinds sideways in the mid-$60Ks with weak inflows, more forced long liquidations will occur as over-levered players are flushed. If $60K breaks and holds, the narrative shifts from orderly reset to downside overshoot. For IBIT, the translation is straightforward:

A clean defense of $60K in BTC keeps IBIT above roughly $35–$36, preserving the narrative of a consolidation inside a large-scale uptrend.
A decisive break below $60K with accelerating ETF outflows opens $30–$32 in IBIT as a realistic downside zone where genuine capitulation appears.

In parallel, gold is testing higher as some macro desks argue BTC may underperform gold in a prolonged risk-off phase, adding another competitive drag to flows into IBIT.

Bitcoin ETF flows, IBIT positioning and whether this is a buy, sell or hold

Putting all of this together for IBIT and Bitcoin (BTC-USD):

IBIT is trading at $38–$39, roughly doubling from its 52-week low but still almost halved from its 52-week high of $71.82.
The ETF complex has seen about $360M in net BTC outflows and $161M ETH outflows in a week, with four straight negative weeks, while $1.9B in derivatives liquidations has already reset part of the leverage risk.
BlackRock’s transfers of 1,701 BTC and 22,661 ETH to Coinbase Prime show real coins being prepared for sale to meet outflows, not just accounting entries.
Institutional allocators like Harvard are cutting IBIT exposure by ~21% while adding ~$86.8M in ETHA, signaling rotation, not abandonment.
Alternative products – particularly XRP investment vehicles – are starting to see modest inflows even as prices like XRP-USD at $1.45 stay under pressure, further fragmenting the flow picture.
Macro is hostile: correlation with high-beta tech, Iran tension, rate uncertainty, and extreme fear at 10 all argue for continued volatility and headline-driven moves.
Structurally, institutions are capping total crypto exposure around 3%, according to Kevin O’Leary, focusing primarily on BTC and ETH while remaining extremely cautious on altcoins.

Given that configuration, IBIT at $38 is not a clear-cut sell from a risk-reward standpoint, but it is also not a “blind buy” for anyone with a short time horizon. The leverage reset, the extreme fear and the distance from the 52-week high suggest significant downside has already been priced in, while the flow rotation into ETH and the ETF outflows indicate the bull case is no longer one-way.

On balance, the stance that fits the data is:

IBIT is a tactical Buy with a high-risk profile, conditional on BTC-USD holding the $60K zone and IBIT respecting the $35 area as a structural floor.

Above those levels, the combination of:

Cleaned-out derivative leverage after $1.9B in liquidations
Extreme-fear sentiment at 10
Ongoing mainstream adoption via vehicles like IBIT, ETHA and XRP products
And the sponsor’s ability to support large, regulated BTC exposure

creates a favorable asymmetry for investors who accept volatility, with upside back toward the low-$50s in IBIT (roughly equivalent to $90K+ BTC) if ETF flows stabilize and macro risk moderates.

If BTC breaks and closes well below $60K and IBIT cracks $35 on heavy volume with continued ETF outflows, this thesis fails, and IBIT moves back into Hold or Reduce territory until a new, lower equilibrium is found.

That's TradingNEWS