Meta Stock Price Forecast - META at $644: Market Overreaction or Rare AI Discount?

Meta Stock (NASDAQ:META) – AI CapEx squeeze now, platform optionality later

Meta stock (NASDAQ:META) trades near $644.93, up 0.27% on the day with an intraday range of $636.72–$646.71 and a previous close at $643.22. The shares sit well above the 52-week low at $479.80 and below the high at $796.25, giving Meta a market value around $1.63 trillion with a trailing P/E of 22.30 and a 0.33% dividend yield. The market has faded the post-earnings spike and pushed the stock back toward pre-earnings levels as heavy AI and hardware CapEx and the lack of a dedicated cloud business make the spending profile look aggressive, but the operating data show a franchise still compounding cash at scale while being priced at a discount to peers with similar growth and AI ambitions.

Meta Stock (NASDAQ:META) – Core family and ads engine still compounding at scale

Meta’s family of apps remains the economic engine. Family daily active people reached about 3.58 billion in Q4, up 7% year over year, only slightly slower than the 8% growth seen in the prior quarter, which is robust considering the global saturation level of social platforms. Core engagement is not collapsing; it is slowly expanding on top of an already massive base. Revenue for the quarter came in around $59.89 billion, delivering 23.78% YoY growth and beating consensus by roughly $1.42 billion, with strength across all major geographic regions. The more important shift is under the hood. AI-driven ranking and targeting pushed ad impressions higher in every region, while average price per ad declined as macro softness and cautious marketing budgets pressured pricing. That pattern—impressions growth offsetting weaker pricing—confirms that Meta’s AI stack is driving more surface, more relevance and more volume through the same user base. The adjusted EPS print of about $8.88 represented slower growth, around 11% versus roughly 20% previously, but still beat expectations by about $0.70 per share. Earnings growth is moderating because management is deliberately leaning into spend, not because the engagement or ad franchise is stalling.

Meta Stock (NASDAQ:META) – Free cash flow resilience under heavier CapEx

Despite the CapEx ramp, Meta remains a cash-rich machine. Over the last twelve months, free cash flow reached roughly $46.11 billion, above the three-year average of about $43.49 billion, even though capital expenditures stepped up sharply during the generative AI build-out. In Q4 alone, CapEx climbed about 49% YoY to roughly $22.1 billion, yet free cash flow still landed near $14 billion, up about 7% YoY. Forward projections embedded in the Street’s models point to free cash flow averaging around $35 billion in 2026–2027. That implies compression from the recent peak, but still leaves ample room to fund the new dividend, execute buybacks and support strategic investments. The key point is that cash is being reallocated into AI infrastructure and hardware, not disappearing. The margin profile will look different from pre-2025, but the absolute cash generation remains at a level most large-cap peers would trade a premium for.

Meta Stock (NASDAQ:META) – 2026 expense and CapEx pivot as the core risk narrative

The real friction with the market sits in 2026 guidance. Management outlined total expenses in a $162–$169 billion range and a CapEx budget between $115–$135 billion. That is a step-function increase versus past years and implies roughly a 73% CapEx jump over 2025. This spending profile is already visible in the income statement. Research and development costs rose from about 25% of revenue to roughly 29%, general and administrative costs expanded as a share of revenue, and operating margin compressed by around 7 percentage points year over year in Q4. Reality Labs’ operating loss widened to roughly $6 billion in the quarter from about $5 billion a year earlier, with more than $19 billion in operating losses over the last twelve months, and guidance points to similar Reality Labs losses in 2026. That combination—heavier R&D, stubborn Reality Labs losses and a multi-year CapEx surge—explains why the stock gave back the earnings pop. The market is effectively saying: show clearer monetization or the multiple stays capped.

Meta Stock (NASDAQ:META) – AI strategy without a hyperscale cloud business

Unlike other mega-caps that justify AI CapEx with a cloud platform, Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:META) is funneling AI investment primarily into its advertising engine, recommendation systems and consumer-facing products rather than a rentable infrastructure layer. That creates an optics problem. Hyperscalers can point to AI services and cloud workloads as direct revenue streams supporting their spend; Meta has to prove that AI-boosted engagement, ad load and performance can deliver equivalent returns on a much less obvious monetization surface. The company’s AI work already drives higher impressions, better click-through and stronger measurement in the ads stack, and management is leaning into Meta Superintelligence, an internal unit tasked with pushing model capabilities to the point where AI can underpin the full product experience. The strategic bet is clear: if Meta does not scale compute and models now, it risks falling behind in the foundational layer that will shape discovery, content creation and commerce on its platforms for the next decade. That explains the CapEx profile, but until AI-native features translate into visibly higher revenue per user and new revenue streams, the equity market will discount part of that story.

Meta Stock (NASDAQ:META) – Reality Labs, smart glasses and hardware platform ambitions

Reality Labs remains the most controversial part of the capital allocation story. Segment revenue declined 12% in Q4 while operating losses deepened to around $6 billion, and management has signaled that losses will remain substantial in 2026. The metaverse pitch has largely faded from the front page, but Meta is repositioning this unit as a gateway to AI-first hardware, especially smart glasses and wearables built with partners like Ray-Ban and Oakley. The strategic logic is straightforward. Today Meta is effectively an application layer living on top of Apple’s iOS and Google’s Android. Owning more of the hardware and distribution surface would give Meta greater control over data, interfaces and monetization, pushing it closer to a true platform rather than an app constrained by mobile operating system policies and fee structures. The risk is that Reality Labs continues to burn tens of billions without ever reaching scale, but the payoff—if AI glasses and other devices become mainstream endpoints for AI assistants and immersive communication—could be a differentiated hardware-plus-software stack that reduces dependency on rival ecosystems. For now, equity markets are assigning a heavy discount to that optionality, which contributes to the current valuation gap.

Meta Stock (NASDAQ:META) – Institutional positioning, options flow and insider context

Ownership structure and flow data show that large pools of capital are still aligned with Meta stock (NASDAQ:META). Meta appears among the top five holdings of high-profile “super-investors” tracked by aggregators, and within the top ten positions by portfolio concentration for that cohort. On the institutional side, roughly 80% of shares are held by institutions, with recent data showing about 4,282 institutional buyers versus 2,946 sellers over the trailing twelve months, and inflows around $195.95 billion versus outflows near $93.90 billion. Options data also reflect a shift away from aggressive downside positioning. Put-to-call volume ratios are running below 1.0, around 0.74 on active volume and 0.60 on open interest, which indicates a tilt toward calls and a reduction in outright bearish structures. For additional color on insider alignment, market participants can track transactions and holdings directly via the Meta insider section on TradingNews at this profile link, which provides an updated view of direct buying, selling and award activity by senior figures. When top external capital allocators and a high-ownership institutional base maintain or increase exposure while the multiple compresses, that usually signals that strong money views the volatility as opportunity rather than structural impairment.

Meta Stock (NASDAQ:META) – GARP profile, valuation gap and relative positioning

From a GARP lens, Meta now screens as one of the more attractive names in the large-cap AI complex. The stock trades around 21–22x forward earnings, slightly below its own five-year average around 22–23x, despite a top line still growing north of 20% and mid-teens earnings growth expected once the CapEx and expense base normalize. Longer-term models point to EPS growth in the 13–19% annual range between 2027 and 2030, implying a forward PEG near 1.1–1.6x, which is reasonable for a dominant digital advertising franchise with a clean balance sheet, heavy buybacks and fresh optionality in AI hardware and services. By contrast, some peers are trading on richer multiples with similar or slower growth. The market is effectively charging a discount for Meta’s lack of a cloud business, its Reality Labs drag and regulatory overhangs, even though free cash flow and user metrics are holding up. That discount is precisely what creates the asymmetry: if AI investments lift ad monetization and new products without further multiple compression, the equity has room to re-rate back toward, or modestly above, its historical average.

Meta Stock (NASDAQ:META) – Verdict: Buy, with volatility as the entry mechanism

Pulling the strands together, Meta Stock (NASDAQ:META) looks like a Buy at current levels for market participants who can handle volatility and multi-year noise around margins. The core social and ads franchise is still scaling revenue in the mid-20s percent range with a daily active footprint above 3.5 billion people. Free cash flow remains powerful even after a 49% CapEx jump, and projections around $35 billion annually in 2026–2027 still support dividends, buybacks and strategic initiatives. The $115–$135 billion CapEx guidance and $162–$169 billion total expense range for 2026 are the main overhang but are directed at defending and extending Meta’s position in AI, recommendation, compute and hardware rather than covering structural demand weakness. Reality Labs is an expensive call option on AI-centric devices, but even with that drag the valuation near 22x earnings does not price the company like a broken model. With institutional ownership high, options flow turning less defensive and prominent capital allocators building positions, the risk-reward skews positive. Short-term drawdowns driven by headlines about spending, regulation or hardware losses are more likely to be used as add points than as reasons to abandon the name while the business still compounds at this pace.

That's TradingNEWS