Oil Price Forecast: Oil Bounce But Stay Trapped: WTI CL=F Near $61, Brent BZ=F Around $66

Oil Price Forecast: WTI CL=F And Brent BZ=F Locked In A Geopolitical Range, Not A Supercycle

Oil price snapshot: WTI CL=F around $61 and Brent BZ=F near $66 after a 2.5% weekly rebound

WTI front-month futures are trading around the $60–61 zone, with recent trades near $60.8–$61 and a weekly gain of roughly 2.5%. Brent is anchored in the mid-$60s, around $65–66, posting a similar weekly advance after a brief slide closer to $60 earlier in the month. Both benchmarks sold off when tariff fears eased and then reversed sharply as the market repriced Iran and Kazakhstan risk into the curve. The pattern is not trend, it is a range regime with volatility spikes driven by headlines.

Geopolitical premium: Trump’s “armada” to Iran pushes a risk layer into CL=F and BZ=F

The immediate catalyst for the latest bounce is Washington’s posture toward Tehran. The US president publicly stated that a naval “armada” including an aircraft carrier and guided-missile destroyers is moving toward the Gulf, while warning Iran against restarting its nuclear program or escalating the crackdown on protesters. Iran pumps roughly 3.2 million barrels per day and sits behind the Strait of Hormuz, the most critical chokepoint in global seaborne oil flows. The market is not reacting to confirmed lost barrels; it is repricing transit risk and sanction risk. That is enough to add a geopolitical premium on WTI and Brent even inside a fundamentally oversupplied system.

Kazakhstan’s Tengiz outage: heavy local impact, limited global shock

The fire and shutdown at Kazakhstan’s Tengiz field, operated by the Chevron-led consortium, has removed one of the world’s largest individual crude streams from the market for days and potentially the rest of the month. Tengiz accounts for close to half of Kazakhstan’s production, which normally sits near 1.8 million barrels per day. With Tengiz offline, national output can slide toward the 1.0–1.1 million barrels per day zone. This meaningfully tightens specific sour crude grades and export routes through the Black Sea. However, on a 100-million-plus barrel-per-day global base and with large stockpiles, it acts as a bullish factor at the margin, not as a structural supply shock.

Demand side: 930 kb/d growth in 2026, entirely from non-OECD buyers

Forecasts for 2026 point to global oil demand rising by roughly 930,000 barrels per day, slightly stronger than the 850,000 barrels per day increase estimated for 2025 as tariff noise eases and lower prices feed through. All of the incremental demand comes from non-OECD economies; consumption in the OECD block is flat to modestly negative as efficiency gains and slower gasoline growth offset petrochemical and jet fuel gains. This is steady, not explosive, growth. It underpins a floor for CL=F and BZ=F but does not justify a structural repricing into supercycle territory while supply expands faster than demand.

Supply side: 2.5 mb/d extra capacity on top of a 3 mb/d surge caps upside

Global supply dynamics remain the dominant constraint on sustained upside. After adding around 3 million barrels per day in 2025, world oil supply is projected to increase by about 2.5 million barrels per day in 2026, reaching roughly 108–109 million barrels per day. Non-OPEC+ contributes the bulk of that growth, led by the United States, Canada, Brazil, Guyana and Argentina. Inside OPEC+, Saudi Arabia is unwinding prior cuts and has meaningful room to raise output. The core fact is simple: supply growth is running materially above demand growth. That is why, even with Iran risk and Kazakhstan outages, WTI is anchored near $60 and Brent near $65 instead of trading in the $80–90 band.

Inventories and surplus: 470 million barrels added in 2025 create a massive buffer

The key structural constraint on any sustained rally is the stock overhang. Observed global oil inventories increased by roughly 470 million barrels over 2025, an average surplus of around 1.3 million barrels per day. In November alone, stocks rose by about 75 million barrels, with crude accounting for almost all of the build as barrels moved from tankers into onshore storage. By year-end, total observed stocks sat more than 430 million barrels above the levels at the start of 2025. This is a huge buffer. Any geopolitical shock or localized outage now trades against a background of full tanks and ample floating storage, which mechanically limits the ability of CL=F and BZ=F to break out and stay elevated without a prolonged, deep drawdown trend.

Refining and products: high runs, weaker margins and no sign of desperate crude buying

Crude runs surged to around 85–86 million barrels per day in December as refiners in the United States, Europe, the Middle East and Asia pushed throughput ahead of first-quarter maintenance. For 2026, refinery activity is expected to average in the mid-80 million barrels per day range, with annual growth below one million barrels per day. At the same time, refining margins and product cracks, particularly in Europe, have compressed as middle-distillate strength faded from earlier highs. This combination means refiners are not aggressively bidding for barrels at any price. They are managing runs into a well-supplied products market, which further restrains sustained upside for CL=F and BZ=F.

OPEC+ spare capacity: 4–4.5 mb/d of elastic supply above current production

OPEC+ still holds substantial spare capacity that can be deployed on a 90-day horizon. Saudi Arabia is producing around 9.7 million barrels per day against sustainable capacity north of 12 million, implying spare capacity in the 2.4 million barrels per day range. Across the broader core OPEC group, effective spare capacity sits in the area of 4–4.5 million barrels per day once chronically constrained barrels in Iran and Russia are excluded. This is a critical part of the ceiling: if Brent BZ=F pushes too far into the 70s purely on risk premium, the financial and political incentives to open the taps increase sharply. That optionality overhang makes aggressive long-term bullish positioning difficult to justify on fundamentals alone.

Technical profile for WTI CL=F: locked between the 50-day and 200-day averages around $60

On the chart, WTI is trading a clear range. Price is oscillating around the $60 mark, with the 50-day exponential moving average sitting slightly below spot and the 200-day average above. Every dip toward the lower band attracts buying interest, and every push toward the upper band meets selling pressure. The market has bounced multiple times from a larger structural floor, but each attempt to build a sustained uptrend has stalled under the 200-day line. This configuration is classic mean reversion: CL=F is a trader’s market around $60, not an investor’s breakout.

Technical profile for Brent BZ=F: magnet at $65 with repeated failures at higher resistance

Brent’s structure mirrors WTI at a higher price level. Spot is gravitating around $65, with the 50-day moving average below and the 200-day moving average overhead. Every Iran or Kazakhstan headline drives an intraday spike toward the 200-day area, and every easing in tariff or geopolitical risk pulls prices back toward the mid-60s. The tape is noisy and headline-sensitive, but structurally it is another range regime. For BZ=F, the market is expressing exactly the same message as for CL=F: the path of least resistance is sideways within a defined band rather than an extended trend.

Macro overlay: tariffs, 4.4% US GDP and the oil–FX feedback loop

Trade policy remains a major volatility driver. Tariff threats on Europe and the Greenland episode temporarily knocked risk sentiment and re-priced global growth expectations lower, dragging on oil. Subsequent walk-backs triggered relief rallies and some weakening in the dollar, which supported commodities. Underneath that noise, US macro data have been strong: annualised GDP growth around 4.4% in the third quarter of 2025 and jobless claims near 200,000 point to a resilient domestic backdrop. That resilience is sufficient to prevent a collapse in oil demand but not strong enough to absorb the entire supply and inventory overhang quickly. At the same time, the oil–FX link remains visible. As West Texas Intermediate stabilises around $59–60, the Canadian dollar has strengthened, with USD/CAD consolidating near 1.38 after a four-day decline. Rising CL=F supports CAD because Canada is a major crude exporter; this, in turn, feeds back into financial conditions and into how energy equities trade.

Iran and the Strait of Hormuz: volume concentration and transit risk, not yet a lost-barrels story

Iran is central to the current risk premium. The country produces more than 3 million barrels per day and exports a significant share to Asia, particularly China. The real systemic threat is not the current sanction profile, which the market has partially adapted to, but any escalation that endangers shipping through the Strait of Hormuz. Closing or materially disrupting this chokepoint, even briefly, would force a rapid repricing of BZ=F and CL=F higher. For now, most institutional analysis still expects any US military move to be calibrated, and major exporters such as Saudi Arabia emphasise that the market is well supplied. That combination keeps the Iran premium real but contained.

Sudan and Heglig: corridor risk for South Sudanese flows rather than a global pivot

The fighting in Sudan and the government’s insistence that the Heglig field remains under state control matters more for perception than for headline volume. Most economically significant production in the region comes from South Sudan, but it relies on infrastructure running through Sudan for processing and export. Heglig sits inside that corridor. Khartoum’s messaging is aimed at insurers, operators and foreign partners who price decisions on whether infrastructure is secure enough to staff and insure, not just whether it is technically producing. For now there is no credible verification that the RSF has taken sustained control of Heglig’s core assets, so the impact is a localized corridor risk, not a shock that changes the global CL=F and BZ=F balance.

Russia, Kazakhstan and the Black Sea: targeted disruptions inside a surplus system

Russian crude output has shown a strong rebound despite attacks on domestic energy infrastructure, with production climbing by hundreds of thousands of barrels per day month on month to reach multi-year highs. However, steeper discounts on Russian barrels mean export revenues remain far below pre-invasion levels. At the same time, Ukrainian drone strikes against export infrastructure in the Black Sea and Caspian have constrained Kazakh flows that rely on those routes. The Tengiz outage amplifies this tightening effect for specific grades. These developments are bullish at the margin and supportive for BZ=F, but they are occurring inside a market that is still long supply and long inventories. The net effect is a higher floor within the range, not a break into a new price regime.

Venezuela and sanctioned barrels: political constraints on latent spare supply

Venezuela remains a key source of latent heavy crude supply, constrained primarily by sanctions and policy rather than geology. Washington’s reopening of limited access for US refiners at steep discounts offers some relief in balancing heavy-sour slates, but the lack of long-term security guarantees keeps many buyers cautious. The same pattern holds for Iranian barrels sitting in floating storage or under opaque trade structures. These politically constrained volumes function as pseudo spare capacity: they can re-enter the market faster than new offshore or deepwater projects can be sanctioned, adding another layer to the ceiling above CL=F and BZ=F.

Fundamental bands: realistic trading ranges for CL=F and BZ=F over the next 6–12 months

Combining demand growth of roughly 930,000 barrels per day, projected supply growth of 2.5 million barrels per day, approximately 4–4.5 million barrels per day of spare capacity and a 470-million-barrel inventory overhang, the most realistic outcome for the next 6–12 months is a broad trading range rather than a structural bull or bear market. For WTI CL=F, a reasonable working band is roughly $58–67, with $60 as the central magnet. For Brent BZ=F, the corresponding range is around $63–73, with $65 at the centre. Moves toward the top of those ranges will usually need a combination of elevated geopolitical risk, prolonged outages such as an extended Tengiz shutdown and strict OPEC+ discipline. Moves toward the lower edge will typically require growth scares, tariff escalations or evidence that non-OPEC supply and OPEC+ production both run hotter than forecast.

Asymmetry between daily headlines and quarterly balances in oil pricing

Crude is currently priced at the intersection of two different time scales. On the daily scale, comments about an “armada” heading to Iran, an explosion in Kazakhstan or a corridor dispute in Sudan add or remove dollars from CL=F and BZ=F within hours. On the quarterly scale, the market is anchored by the reality of a very large stock cushion, faster supply growth than demand growth and meaningful spare capacity in the core OPEC producers. The intraday candles are driven by geopolitics; the longer-term trend is governed by the surplus. Any serious analysis of oil pricing must keep both layers in view, but the surplus side is what ultimately explains why WTI is trading near $60 and Brent near $65 even as geopolitical noise remains high.

That's TradingNEWS